Rinnovabili • War pollution: Iran conflict's carbon footprint Rinnovabili • War pollution: Iran conflict's carbon footprint

War pollution: the carbon footprint of 14 days of conflict in Iran

A new report calculates the immense war pollution from 14 days of conflict in Iran, releasing millions of tons of CO2.

War pollution: Iran conflict's carbon footprint
Generic image of a destroyed city, via Depositphotos

The environmental toll of war pollution

The toll of two weeks of war in Iran for CO2 emissions is over 5 million tons, which, projected over a year, would equate to almost 131 million, a figure comparable to the total sum produced by 84 countries (the lowest-ranking in terms of polluting emissions). The Climate and Community Institute (CCI) think tank has calculated the impact of war pollution during the first 14 days of the conflict between Israel and the US and the Islamic Republic, warning that military operations could cause $1.3 billion in climate damages.

Military attacks by the United States and Israel continue to kill thousands and cause displacement throughout the Middle East. Initial estimates indicate that the financial costs of the conflict for the United States could amount to almost $16.5 billion. However, the severe environmental damage caused by bombings targeting oil refineries, desalination plants, and military facilities could double, if not triple, in the next ten days.

Two weeks of war in Iran produced more carbon pollution than Iceland’s annual output

According to the analysis by the Climate and Community Institute think tank, from February 28 to March 14, the war caused 5,054,000 tons of carbon dioxide, a figure exceeding Iceland’s total carbon pollution for 2024. The CO2 emissions from two weeks of conflict are equivalent to those resulting from the use of 1.1 million gasoline cars for an entire year.

The analysis focuses on direct and indirect emissions across five impact categories:

  • Emissions embodied in munitions: the carbon embodied in the production of missiles and drones used by the United States, Israel, Iran, and other countries in the region affected by the conflict.
  • Fuel for military operations: the estimate of total emissions from fuel used by fighter jets and equipment, and that employed for support operations (troop transport, in-flight refueling of jets, and naval unit movements).
  • Destroyed fuel: fuel that went up in flames due to the bombing of storage depots, refineries, and oil tankers.
  • Loss of military assets: destroyed or damaged fighter jets, ships, and other military vehicles.
  • Infrastructure reconstruction: emissions from the destruction of homes, schools, and other civilian infrastructure that will require total or partial rebuilding.

Carbon emissions from February 28 to March 14, 2026

The data highlights a massive impact. The total figure therefore reflects both the impact of direct warfare and the emissions resulting from the systematic destruction of civilian and energy infrastructure.

ActivityTotal emissions (tCO2e)
Destroyed homes and buildings2,415,000
Destroyed fuel1,883,000
Fuel used (operations and support)529,000
Carbon embodied in equipment172,000
Missiles and drones55,000
TOTAL5,054,000

The burden of reconstruction

The emissions generated during debris removal and subsequent reconstruction constitute the primary cause of war pollution. Rebuilding homes, roads, hospitals, schools, and energy facilities and other infrastructure in the affected region, which encompasses 14 states from Cyprus to Azerbaijan, will be a very costly and carbon-intensive operation. The same think tank has estimated that reconstruction in Gaza and Lebanon will produce at least 24 times more emissions than those generated during the conflict phase alone.

Rising carbon costs

According to the think tank’s estimates, the carbon costs of war will continue to rise drastically as the conflict prolongs. The reasons are diverse but in some ways obvious. Firstly, due to the need to replenish arsenals: an increase in embodied emissions from the production of new weapons and the fuel required to transport them to the region is anticipated. Furthermore, continued targeting of energy infrastructure is causing a massive release of emissions due to the uncontrolled combustion of fossil fuels, much like what occurred during the Gulf War.

Also read Water: the Middle East’s real strategic vulnerability
Rinnovabili •

About Author / Erminia Voccia

Professional journalist with a passion for storytelling and a keen eye on global dynamics. She holds a Master’s degree in International Relations and two postgraduate diplomas in journalism and broadcast journalism. She began her career in television, producing reports for national news programs, and later worked as a freelancer for several national newspapers, online outlets, and specialized magazines. Her writing has focused on the environment, international affairs, and geopolitics, with a particular interest in Asia. She has also managed event planning and communication for a publishing house and contributed to the editing of academic essays. At Rinnovabili, she mainly covers climate and climate policy.